An investor who requires a 6.0 per cent yield on the rent and a lease written at 1.80x cover is paying 9.26x EBITDARM, not the 11.00x the trade market quotes. The three ratios are locked together: cover times yield times multiple equals one. On this home the trade is worth £16,816,691 and the lease £14,155,464 — a difference of £2,661,227 that somebody is holding.
Three ratios, two judgements
Every care home transaction is described with three numbers. The multiple of EBITDARM the trade is worth — here 11.00x. The yield an investor requires on the rent — here 6.0 per cent. The cover the lender requires — here 1.80x. They are quoted as three separate judgements, reached by three separate parties, in three separate documents.
They are not three judgements. The trade is worth the multiple times EBITDARM. The lease is worth the rent divided by the yield, and the rent is EBITDARM divided by the cover. If one home has one value, those two expressions are the same expression, and they agree only when cover × yield × multiple = 1. Nothing has been assumed except that a building cannot be worth two amounts at once.
So any two of the three fix the third. Quote all three and one of them is either redundant or wrong.
Any two of the ratios fix the third. There is no combination in which all three are free.
Hold these two
The third becomes
An 11.00x multiple and a 6.0 per cent yield
1.52x cover
An 11.00x multiple and 1.80x cover
5.05 per cent yield
A 6.0 per cent yield and 1.80x cover
9.26x multiple
What the cover requirement costs
The home in question earns EBITDARM of £1,528,790. Valued as a trade it is worth £16,816,691; valued as the lease that the lender's cover and the investor's yield produce, it is worth £14,155,464 — both figures describing the same building on the same day.
The same home, valued as a trade and valued as a lease.
Valuation
Amount
Value of the trade at 11.00x EBITDARM
£16,816,691
Value of the lease at 1.80x cover and a 6.0 per cent yield
£14,155,464
Difference
£2,661,227
The multiple the investor is actually paying
9.26x
A lender who asks for 1.80x cover rather than the 1.52x the other two numbers imply is not asking for prudence. At an unchanged yield he is asking the seller for £2.7 million of value. The answer to that request is not an argument about prudence; it is a repricing of the yield. Relaxing cover from 1.80x to 1.52x is worth the same £2.7 million to the borrower, which turns a relationship conversation into an arithmetic one: does the extra margin cost less than that over the life of the facility?
Why the rent is not a negotiation
The identity holds because the rent in a care home is not set the way a rent is set anywhere else. There is no market rent, because there is no alternative use and no alternative tenant facing a different trade. There is a lender's cover test, and the rent is what falls out of it: rent = EBITDARM divided by cover.
The rent is an output. Nobody negotiated £849,328.
Line
Amount
EBITDARM
£1,528,790
Required cover
1.80x
Rent
£849,328
Rent per registered bed
£12,133
Rent as a share of revenue
17.2 per cent
The last line is the tell. Rent at 17.2 per cent of revenue is not a market convention; it is the EBITDARM margin of 31.0 per cent divided by the cover of 1.80x. Anyone who quotes a care home rent as a share of revenue is quoting a margin and a cover at the same time without knowing it.
The line the cover is tested on matters as much as the level. Tested on EBITDARM the lease covers 1.80x. Tested on EBITDAR — after the management charge the operator cannot actually remove — it covers 1.51x. That is 0.29x of cover, or £246,666 a year, and it is decided by one clause.
What to do with it
Multiply the three ratios in any memorandum that quotes them. If the product is not one, ask which number is the residual. Whoever wrote the document will usually not know.
Price a cover requirement rather than debate it. Between 1.80x and 1.52x sits £2,661,227 at an unchanged yield, and the seller is entitled to ask for it back in the yield.
Give the seller the choice the identity reveals. At a trade market of 11.00x and a lease priced at 9.26x, selling the operating business is worth £2.7 million more than selling the lease. A seller who has not computed the identity does not know he had a choice.
Do not conclude that the two valuations price the same risk. They coincide numerically at the implied cover and nowhere else. The trade prices a business with a licence, a manager and a referral network; the lease prices a contractual income from a tenant who holds all three.
That last point is where the money goes after a sale and leaseback. What the operator keeps once the rent is paid is £432,797, geared 3.53x to EBITDARM, and the transaction creates value only if a leased operating company trades above 6.15x. The identity says the difference between the two valuations exists. It does not say it has disappeared.
The workbooks behind this article
Every figure above is a live formula in the free companion files for
Senior Living and Healthcare Real Estate. Each workbook ends with a Checks sheet
setting the printed figure beside the computed one. No account and no email address.
At what wealth does a family office pay?A five-person office costs the same $2,442,000 at $100m as at $2bn. Against a tiered multi-family schedule the two curves cross exactly once.
Does an undrawn revolver count as liquidity?67.4567 per cent of the headroom, and it leaves at a fall in annual revenue of 8.4127 per cent — not the 13.3333 per cent the board deck implies.
Does supply chain finance count as debt?66,049,315 released, and leverage of 2.7622× or 3.1362× depending on which balance the test is asked of — the second is a breach at today's EBITDA.
Does the fulcrum move with enterprise value?A worked capital structure at three enterprise values. The break migrates from the first lien to the subordinated notes without a single document changing.
How many companies does a reserve pool defend?Holding pro rata to the Series D costs $14.76m per company. A $40m reserve defends 2.71 of forty — and 61 per cent of the cost is the last round.
How much room a 1.15x downside actually leaves79 basis points of margin. The leverage covenant fails first, five basis points before the coverage covenant the chapter reports on, and 4.6 per cent of EBITDA is the whole cushion.
How the GP catch-up is actually solvedMost write-ups state the catch-up formula then hardcode the answer. Set it as a solve and it moves on its own when the carry rate does.
How do you set a minimum cash balance?Three components, 124,596,281 in total — and the double count that turns a margin of 27,403,719 into an apparent shortfall of -3,988,281.
Is a 2/10 net 60 discount worth taking?An annualised 14.8980 per cent against a revolver at 4.50 per cent — worth 5,471,890 a year, and 0.3132 turns of reported leverage.
Should corporate debt be fixed or floating?78.1818 per cent of gross debt fixed, and a net floating exposure after cash of -608,000.00 — the proportion, not the instrument.
Six ways to state the same fund's return7.12 per cent, 18.04 per cent, or 1.323 times the public market — one fund, one set of flows. The eleven-point gap is the valuation, and it is not cash.
The IRR at which a closed-ended fund merely tiesA drawdown fund advertising 13.25 per cent ties an evergreen netting 8.64. On committed rather than called capital, 78.7 per cent of the edge vanishes.
The month a remediation trigger has to be armed byMonth 8, on a one-year window and a 14-week hiring lead time. The date is 12W − L/4.33 and holds for any portfolio size — the book only changes the euros.
Two routes to the same NAVFive findings in one quarter-end close, and not one of them was a modelling error. Every one was a control that did not exist.
What a CBAM certificate buffer costs to holdCarry and protection are both linear in the buffer, so the break-even probability is identical at 5 per cent and at 30 — and 2027 costs exactly twice 2026.
What a clawback actually collateralises24 million recovers 13.20 net of tax and 7.20 is escrowed. The rule is e ≥ 1 − t, and every euro won on the tax clause lands uncollateralised.
What a co-investment programme actually saves37 basis points, and a 22.8 per cent total-loss rate erases it. At the usual per-deal cap a single failure is 37 per cent of the annual cohort.
What a diligence exercise actually recoversEighteen basis points is only the part that reaches the yield. Three of the four instruments never do, and the exercise is worth thirty-one.
What a follow-on reserve is actually worth0.019 turns under plain dilution, 0.285 under pay-to-play. The optimum is a property of the shareholders’ agreement, not of the portfolio.
What a lease mark-to-market is actually worth5,788,000 becomes 807,365 once the over-market stream, the expiry dates and the cost of re-letting are priced — and nothing at all below a 43.7 per cent renewal rate.
What a minimum payment actually does£81.53 leaves the account and £20.46 reaches the debt. On minimums alone the set clears in 258 months and repays 1.78 times what was borrowed.
What a month of delay costs in an enforcement463,000 euros of present value a month. No single error about enforcement, and no pair of errors, moves the indifference point from 58.7 cents to the 72 on the table.
What a pro rata cheque actually costsDefending costs 1.25 times the initial cheque across two rounds, not more in each — and below a 521 exit the follow-on dollars come back worth less than they cost.
What a subscription line does to the IRR20 per cent becomes 38.41 on the same asset while the multiple falls. Two dollars of interest buys 18.4 points, and the longer the line runs the cheaper each point gets.
What one point of fees actually costsOne point on the annual charge turns 738,846 into 567,961 over forty years — 23 per cent of the pot, and 2.43 of wealth lost per 1 of fee.
When the promote stops clearingCarried interest is not proportional to performance near the hurdle. It is a step function, and $2m of headroom is what stands between a promote and none.
Why a secondaries bid-ask gap has no zoneThe seller’s floor and the buyer’s ceiling are one formula at two rates. At equal required returns the zone is exactly zero — here it is 11.02 points apart.
Why refining a due diligence rubric makes it weakerThree of twelve managers carry a terminal flaw and the average approves all three. Splitting eight domains into sixteen makes it easier to hide, not harder.