A Practitioner's Guide to Rent Cover, Over-Rent, Covenant Risk and the Part of the Price That Is Not Property
Julian R. Sterling
Nine industrial buildings, 169 000 m², one twenty-year lease from a European food group,
offered at €179.5 million. In a sale and leaseback the rent is not discovered — it is chosen by the
seller, and the price follows. Run this portfolio building by building and 36.7 per cent of that price is
exposure to one company rather than to property.
These are the workbooks the book was written from. Every figure the book prints is reproduced by
a live formula, and the model workbook ends with a sheet that compares the two line by line.
The files
The whole book
The Sale and Leaseback Model
The model every figure in the book is computed from: nine buildings, two rent lines, the five-way decomposition of the price, rent cover on both perimeters, the hazard-rate cash flow with its two discount rates, and the ladder of risk premia from Chapter 9. On the portfolio in the book it finds 36.7 per cent of the price — €65.8 million — that is exposure to one company rather than to property. Overwrite the tape and every figure moves with it.
Sale_and_Leaseback_Model.xlsx · XLSX · 23 KB
Chapter 4, and Chapter 22
The Covenant Monitor
Rent cover at group and at the entity that actually signs the lease — 4.79x against 1.61x on this transaction — plus the year-by-year decay as indexation raises the rent against a profit that may not follow, each cover level read back as a price, and the six things to watch quarterly.
Covenant_Monitor.xlsx · XLSX · 10 KB
Chapters 11, 12 and 22
The Lease Abstract
One row per building: firm term, break, indexation cap and floor, reinstatement, assignment, cross-default, deposit. Then the clause-by-clause value note, ranked by what each provision is worth rather than by custom. Two entries deliberately carry no euro figure, and say why.
Lease_Abstract.xlsx · XLSX · 8 KB
Chapters 20, 21 and 24
The Bid Sheet
The bridge from asking price to bid, the four inversions of Chapter 21 — two of which have no solution at any value — and the eight-line omissions table to put on the facing page. One sheet per section of the committee paper.
Blue on pale blue is an input you may edit. A yellow fill is the carrying assumption of
the sheet — the one to argue about first. Black is a formula. Nothing is locked,
protected or watermarked. There are no macros and no external links.
The model workbook ends with a sheet called Checks: the figure as the book prints it,
the figure the workbook computes, the variance and a status. If a line ever reads
“to check”, the workbook and the book have drifted apart — and the workbook is
right.
Three numbers to compute on your own transaction
The market rent of every building, from an agent with no role in the deal. It
is the only external anchor in a sale and leaseback, and it takes a week. Everything else in the
book is downstream of it.
The split between property and exposure to one company. Here, 62.3 per cent against 36.7 per cent.
A yield discloses neither.
The risk premium the price leaves once the tenant's credit is paid for at the rate its
own bonds command. Here, 36 basis points — against the 241 basis points the arithmetic needs for illiquidity,
management and recovery uncertainty.
One warning, because it decides the answer
A default rate backed out of a bond spread is risk-neutral: it is the rate that
reproduces the bond’s price when the cash flows are discounted at the risk-free rate. Apply
it to a lease and then discount at a property target return, and you have charged for the same
credit risk twice. Sheet 6 of the model is the ladder that avoids it — set both premia to
zero and you are on the only rung strictly comparable with the bond.
Closing the DealTwo defensible bridges 20.70 million apart, a peg worth 7.00 million, and the six choices that remove 6.60 of a 12.00 earn-out.
CMBS and CRE CLOsWhere the loss actually lands, from appraisal reduction to realised severity, and what the B-piece is really being paid for.
How to Read a Commercial LeaseThe three refinements chapter 19 names and never performs, and the renewal rate below which the mark-to-market is worth nothing.
How to Read a Credit AgreementWhere the default actually comes from, the cure that costs 5.5 times the other, and the capacity nobody adds up.
How to Read a Real Estate Loan AgreementThe cure ratio in closed form, the four-point window in which the cheap cure works, and the cure sized to the wrong threshold.
Office Real EstateA six per cent yield that returns 3.2 per cent once the re-letting cycle is paid for, and the headline-to-net-effective rent arithmetic.
Private Equity Real EstateBoth worked waterfalls to the dollar, the two capital stacks, and the arithmetic of the promote made changeable.
Private Markets PerformanceThirty-one of the thirty-three figures chapter 19 publishes reproduce exactly — and the two that do not are named rather than quietly adopted.
Raising a Real Estate FundThe chapter 17 funnel run on a calendar — when the first close actually lands, and why more travel does not help.
Real Estate Financial ModelingProperty, development and fund models built line by line, and the modelling test worked end to end.
Real Estate Fund ManagementThe waterfall of 6.11, the build-to-core of 8.7 and the proceeds gap, reproduced as live formulas rather than asserted.
REIT Analysis and ValuationFFO of 532.0, AFFO of 381.0, net asset value and dividend safety — every figure a formula you can change.
Retail Real EstateThe occupancy cost of every unit in a centre, the sixteen per cent of the rent roll no tenant can sustain, and the right-size-convert-or-hold decision priced.
Self-Storage Real EstateThe cohort engine behind a 590-unit store, and the rate increase on existing customers priced against the move-outs it causes.
The Fund Finance ProfessionalChapter 8 builds the reported-to-eligible NAV bridge; chapter 9 computes every ratio without it. Two points at every state — and what a subscription line does to the IRR.
The Growth Equity InvestorWhat a pro rata cheque really costs, and the band where defending your ownership loses money.
The Private Credit InvestorThe two coverage ratios are not measured on the same thing: the erosion is 47.7 per cent, not the 28.7 the headline implies.
The Private Equity Fund Controller PlaybookThe book defines IRR, DPI, RVPI and TVPI, tells you to update them at the exit, and prints not one value. Computed: a 1.833× deal inside a fund at 0.892 TVPI.
The Venture Capital AssociateWhat defending a position costs, and how many companies a reserve pool actually defends.
Real Estate FinanceFour people look at one building and reach four numbers; the lender is whole only above 105,109,489, twelve per cent below today’s value rather than forty.
Financial Risk ManagementA fund inside every limit that cannot meet a redemption — and the number that decides it is the one with no currency attached.
Business ValuationThree advisers land 26.8 per cent apart on one company, and the whole gap turns out to be 1.96 points of perpetual growth.
Quantitative FinanceThree models agree to a quarter of one per cent about a number that one unobservable input moves a hundred and three times as much.
Asset ManagementFour people quote four returns for one mandate, all correct and 2.7017 points apart — forty-eight times the manager’s net skill.
Alternative InvestmentsA manager reports 13.29 per cent and the endowment earns 6.26 — both correct, and only a third of the advertised advantage arrives.
Credit AnalysisFour defensible EBITDAs on one borrower give leverage from 3.19x to 6.47x — and the add-back argument is fifty times the covenant headroom.
Venture CapitalOne company out of twenty-eight returns 56.7 per cent of the fund, and half the capital goes in after the decision — at half the return.
Machine Learning for FinanceFive people quote the accuracy of one credit model, all five are right, and the number that decides how much money it makes is none of them.
Commercial Real Estate InvestingThe equity earned 8.6647 per cent and the investor received exactly 8.0000 - the preferred return, and nothing above it.
Mergers and AcquisitionsThe board paper says the deal creates 13,436,667 of value. The arithmetic says it destroys 17,530,855. Nobody is lying.
DerivativesThe treasury report says the hedge cost 1,233,698. That is the interest differential, not a cost. The number that mattered appears in no report at all.
Treasury ManagementFive cash balances for one company, all correct and 145,600,000 apart — and the revolver that is two-thirds of the liquidity leaves at a revenue fall of 8.4127 per cent.
Financial Planning and AnalysisRevenue 3.0190 per cent above budget and operating profit 16.3209 per cent below it, in the same quarter, with every figure correctly stated.
Energy TradingA position report that is 91.7031 per cent hedged and correctly computed, on a book that is short 2,542,000 MWh — and a margin call of 198,400,000 the next morning.